The United Nations Migration plan, is a document that seeks to make mass migration a universal right. Introduced as a ‘voluntary agreement’. how long will it stay that way? Those of you working in regulation, law or some sort of leadership body will know that when you wish to improve your compliance process, introduce stricter regulation or additional legislation, you don’t just write it, chose a date and deal with the backlash. No. You introduce the new legislation or governance into an update of the current protocol, using words like ‘should do’ or ‘must consider’ and similar terms. Then, when everyone is following your protocol anyway, because’ hey, it is now ‘best practice’, you make it mandatory on the basis that everyone is already doing it and if you are lucky, without resistance. Other methods, include, ‘ a 12 month consultative period in which you can consider feedback from the court, or members, or whatever it is you are trying to control and ‘take it into account before setting out the final standard’. Of course, no matter the method, it is basically the same game. Then of course, having got your new legislation or regulation through as part of the established standard, you introduce the next round of improvements you want to pass under ‘should’, ‘could’, or ‘may consider’ camouflage.
Allowing the hundreds of millions of people in poorer parts of the world, the right to leave their country and flood into other nations in unprecedented numbers. EU leaders have strongly advocated for the plan, including Emmanuelle Macron and Angela Merkel, despite objections from their own people and in most cases, their own political party.
Indeed, in a now infamous speech, Emmanuel Macron quoted from directly from a book by Professor Stephen Smith and expert in African affairs to state that Europe will be flooded by 150-200 Million African migrants from mainly Muslim African countries as a result of destabilisation, climate change and geopolitical conflict. A strange admission, considering that the EU is doing a great deal to destabilise Africa and almost nothing to support sustainable development and infrastructure. Ditto the UN, as this document clearly proves.
The EU has been widely criticised by prominent figures who have been genuine in their efforts to help African countries develop, for the negative effects of their policies have had on African nations and Europe itself. I wonder if the yellow jacket protestors know what they are being taxed for? They have seen nothing yet. They are fighting for survival but perhaps, the cat is out of the bag and citizens in other countries will begin to strike back at the corrupt, self serving elites that run them and the money from those vested interests that financially back it.
But outside of virtue signalling and the seemingly endless need Europe seems to have to take from Africa what belong to Africa, what are the real issues and outcomes for ordinary people on both continents? Is this just a rather obvious attempt by globalists to create what has become a modern slave trade? Is it possible to integrate such huge numbers into Europe remotely successfully?
The demographic of the migrants from these nations have a very strong chance of requiring hugely disproportionate care and support by any serious measure. Does this sound like a likely source of the doctors, nurses and workforce we are so often told we so desperately need. This is not a migration of people ready to enter the workforce for a very long time, if not generations. Even some of the most optimistic research from Sweden and Germany shows that it is likely to take 10 years or more before migrants arriving from these countries will even begin to enter the mainstream workforce in any real number. This is based upon precedent, factual observation and a very large body of research.
Anyone that has spent time in Africa is amazed by the ingenious and creative people there. Their struggle to survive despite being pawns in a geopolitical game is uplifting and heartbreaking by turns. But, as one of a those people in my peer group that live in other countries and travel extensively, one gains some experience of just how challenging it can be, even where you speak the language, have the education and culturally equivalent morality. This is the complete opposite demographic from that which is being targeted.
There is no doubt that is going to be a dependant group of people, requiring extremely disproportionate investment simply to exist. So, why are we not tackling the cause of these disadvantages and helping African nations and people develop where they are?. Surely, this isn’t a plan to destroy African nations and the lives of European citizens?.
To add insult to injury, the best and brightest tend to be the first to go, leaving a country further depleted and extremely unlikely to be able to develop sustainably by itself causing a cycle of reliance upon the grace and favour of western powers. This is the rape of Africa, and if unchecked, it is going to be worse than anything history has had to offer. The wealthy globalists will become untouchable, everyone else will experience wildly declining standards of living with safety, security, minimum wages and social care, a footnote in history.
If the UN wanted to help Africa, it would invest in infrastructure, schools and supporting African countries in developing long term sustainable economies which are corruption free in return for development aid. It would do more to tackle climate change, to address corruption and support the rule of law. It would punish corporations which behave in a socially irresponsible manner and behave more like curators of the region than rapacious asset stripping predators. Not in a virtue signalling, ‘don’t look too deep’ sort of way. as happens today. But meaningfully, as part of a coherent, structured plan with long term scheduled and monitored goals. We know, that when this happens, it works.
Monrovia’ the capital of Liberia, torn apart during the war and home to a booming population is still a war torn hell after a genocidal conflict that raged from 1989-2003. Famous for its cannibal warlords, child soldiers and some of the worst atrocities the world has ever seen, very little has been achieved to help the country rebuild key infrastructure and institutions. With no sanitation, many of the most populous areas of the city are literally open sewers, as is the beach which runs past the densely populated ‘west point’ slums. It is as if there is little motivation for globalists to actually help African people, but a lot of interest in the natural resources. What is the most important capital of any country?. It’s people. Now the globalist even want to take that away, again. Why? A massive influx of cheap labour with no expectations of fair treat, minimum wages, political enfranchisement and most crucially, no ability to dissent against a globalist agenda.
The social consequences of the mass migration which the UN and EU champion are even more devastating than the financial though they two are simply other sides of the same coin. Very few national health programs in Europe are long term sustainable at present day levels. Mass migration from Africa brings people who have had little or no access to healthcare, may well have taken part in brutal wars which have created the worst genocide outside of WWII. They have had no access to vaccinations and may have been exposed to pathogens which have been unknown in the west for hundreds of years.
So the mass migration does nothing but destroy Africa. Some pundits have given up on trying to help African nations because it is not an easy proposition. However, targetted support works!. Take the example of just one African country. Rwanda, prior to the first democratic elections of 2005. An estimated 800,000 to 1 Million people were murdered in just 100 days in 1994 and the total death toll over the years is the largest number of deaths from conflict since WWII. Well into the millions. Many of these battles were fought using child soldiers, taught to kill in the most brutal and barbaric ways imaginable. Now, years later, many suffer psychosis, trauma and other mental health issues. Would you be ok if, as a child, you had been coerced to consume vast quantities of drugs, rape kill and eat your neighbours or seen the same done to your family?. At the time, the world stood by and did nothing. Not interested, no profit. Indeed, many circumstances surrounding the genocides strongly point to the influence of some of the ”globalists” of the day, in France in particular in aggravating the situation to incite the violence that followed.
But, Rwanda today proves a key point. That an African country, can come from such a terrible past and thrive, given the right support and by allowing Africans to rule Africa well with the right support to end corruption that comes with natural resources. After the meddling which lead to the genocide, Rwanda took a completely different path. Now, the capital, Kigali, is one of the safest cities in Africa, it has relatively low unemployment and sustainable economic growth. The government spends an admirable 6.5% of GDP on healthcare and corruption is the lowest in the region, though there is a great deal more to be done. The point is, that if the globalists want to create successful African countries, they can. If they want to destabilise them, such as they are now, it comes with disastrous consequences.
So, it can work. Rwanda is becoming a safer place to live, the economy is developing and 6.5% spending on healthcare, puts it in alignment with many EU and developed nations. Fortunately, while HIV/AID is very high in Rwanda in comparison with western nations, it is far better than many nations in Southern Africa. The place many of the migrants which globalists are targeting, are expected to arrive from. Many nations in the South of Africa have HIV/AIDS rates between 10 and 24.98% though countries in other parts of the continent are also facing serious problems. Will bringing these people to Europe also bring with it a cure? or an uncontrollable epidemic?
The effect on safety and gender equality is going to be unprecedented. Feminists concerned with the notion of a western rape culture based on rather tenuous evidence are in for a shock.
In the west, we have so broadly defined the definition of rape and sexual assault that it has started to lack any semblance of reasonable definition. Contrast this with South Africa. 40% of women in South Africa WILL be raped during their lifetime. Just consider the implications of that upon your family and friends for a moment.
The situation is so bad, that friends talk of having to walk your wife or daughter to the washroom, in a restaurant, and waiting in case someone has come in a window or follows them in. Women cannot get out of the car when driving in and out of the gate to their property,and many have guards to ensure someone doesnt use a vehicle to follow them in, blocking them in and dragging them off or into the house. Worse, in many cases the level of violence in these attacks is completely unlike anything most people in the west can imagine. There is also the fear that one will become infected with HIV/AIDs if you aren’t killed in the attack.
Polling has shown that, between 1 in 3 and 2 in 3 black South African men ADMIT to having raped. One can only imagine what the actual figure might be. This is a place fanning anti white hatred. Opposition leaders have chanted songs inciting the murder of whites on stage at public rally’s to huge crowds of dancing jeering people.
Western governments are standing off, doing nothing and allowing the situation to develop, with the exception of US President Trump who has instigated an investigation. A country extraordinarily rich in minerals, is all too often, unable to exploit them, corruption prevents investment, infrastructure begins to collapse. A story seen time and time again. So why? instead of telling Africans, if you dont like it, leave, bringing all of those problems with you. Why doesn’t the UN and the West in general work to support the creation and development of a stable, safer, better educated Africa that can support itself. We know that with positive intention, a country can go from Genocide, to sustainable development and relative safety in a surprisingly short period of time.
Indeed, one can find the hand of globalists behind many genocides, behind the exploitation, draining the best and brightest minds and destabilising many countries in Africa for centuries.
Slavery officially ended centuries ago but successive generations of globalists are still meddling in Africa for personal gain and it is this which the UN migration pact is all about.
Sadly, it seems that nothing has changed. For example, isn’t it odd that most western leaders seem to be trying very hard to look the other way when South Africa seems to be regressing so severely?
To come back to Professor Stephen Smith of Duke University once more, from his book, ”In The Rush to Europe” he describes a massive, unprecedented population transfer, which he explains will ”be triggered largely as a result of Western aid money financing migrants journeys from Africa”.
Money going to fund the transportation of large numbered of poor people with little prospects of earning a wage at EU levels, effectively, setting up a mass transit system between Africa and Europe and working at below subsistence level wages and devastating the working conditions of working class people in Europe. Something many other professors have talked about already. The world has done this once before, then people realised it was an evil, thing to do, and abolished it.
The beginning of this process can already be seen in the funding of NGO ships by the best friend of many an EU commissioner and MEP, ‘George Soros’. If Mr Macron’s speech seemed very well informed on the subject. It is because he knows it intimately.
This has already begun. It is only dissent from the leaders of a few nations with leaders which are still aligned with their people and who are unwilling to sell out their national best interest, which prevents the tsunami. Interestingly, many of the leaders opposing the move are from predominantly Balkans and Eastern Europe, which has long been the bulwark against the annihilation of western civilisation allowing western societies to develop. They are also the EU members which are among those who are not in the monetary union and are thus, among the small group of countries doing better than the pitiful EU average when it comes to GDP growth in the face of an increasingly likely EU wide recession affecting much of the Euro zone and perhaps Britain too if the Brits don’t get their act together and get out while the going is less bad. .
The globalists use terms to suggest that Africa, needs and deserves our help and so it does. But it doesn’t need their brand of help. We have been doing that for years and it has got millions and millions of people killed. Africa has been on the wrong side of geopolitics for centuries and it is time that the manipulation stopped.
Global leaders blatantly say one thing to Europeans, and the complete opposite to Africans. Sorry to pick on Mr Macron again, but he is so fanatical that he sometimes forgets that he is on record or just doesn’t understand how insane he sounds. But he is a good barometer for what is going on in the secretive European Group that actually run the EU and their colleagues and allies in the UN. Those Charlemagne prizes don’t come for nothing. You have to have taken the disenfranchisement of your people forward in some manifest way before you get one of those.
After making the sort of wild statements claiming he was basically going to steal Africa’s workforce, as mentioned above, he was in Laos, Nigeria in July 2018 telling Africans the direct opposite of what he actually intends for them; ‘We need more Africans to succeed in Africa’, Let’s build homes for the African youth, in Africa’.
What are we meant to make of this schizophrenic behaviour?. Well, apart from, the fact that if you are ever unfortunate enough to find yourself in a room with the President of France, you might want to make sure you walk backwards out the door, keeping your eyes firmly on him at all times to avoid getting a knife in the back. Clearly, this is not someone anyone can trust. Except maybe those holding his strings, the Presidents of the EU.
It is perhaps a little unfair to single out just one person among this cadre of corruption. Angela Merkel and Theresa May, Juncker, Trusk, Van Rumpuoy and all the other power hungry sociopaths are every bit as keen to jump on the same band wagon. They just have different ways to go about it. In the UK, Theresa May couldn’t wait to sign the UN migration charter. However, I am inclined to employ the aphorism known as ”Hanlon’s razor” in that case, given the performance over recent years. Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
The entire received shockingly little coverage in the mainstream media and indeed parliament in general considering it is one of the most controversial documents ever created. Such is the state of western democracy. With no critical press, politically motivated prosecutions and an increasingly corrupt legal system, do we really live in democratic countries anymore?. Perhaps the aforementioned aphorism does not apply to what seems, at times, like the wilful abuse of power.
This plan is bad for Africa. It is bad for European citizens. Devastating for quality of life, wages, social care, health and security. It is beyond bad, it may even be plain evil.
If you found this interesting, then there are also some great studies that look at what happens when a population is destabilised by a disproportionate number of men in a society.
The headlines are that sexual assault and violent crime always rise dramatically even in relatively sensible countries. But nothing on this scale has ever been seen, so it how this will affect society on this scale is completely new territory. Could it lead to civil war, increasing violence and authoritarian mistreatment of an abused populace. Very possibly.
We can forget gender equality, these people bring a culture and an ideology in which women are very much a possession. Just extrapolating out from the effect of the comparatively few but already very large numbers of migrants into Europe, the future isn’t looking good for women within the EU. Nor any of us that which have a care for them. Which, let’s be honest, is almost everyone. If you want to see how the rules get bent out of shape, law is subverted, look to the prosecution of migrant gang rapists in Sweden.
All this and we haven’t even covered the fact that the migrants targeted are largely from extremely violently ideological Muslim countries. Where women are still murdered for a variety of crimes. Cannot be raped and are in every real way, invisible.
So why is this happening?. It is happening because western people have become too enfranchised. We have expectations of democracy, transparency and accountability which are completely out of alignment with the ambitions of globalists. The internet made it much harder for globalist ambitions to go undetected. A state can control state media, it cannot control your freedom to chose what to watch or read online. This is coming next.
Unwilling to be spoon-fed a diet of pure propaganda from services such as DW, France 24, CNN and the BBC, people started to get more informed than was comfortable for those with plans for you.
Flooding the west with what are going to be, disenfranchised, poor people with little prospects or stake in the life of host nations would be extremely effective in resetting the expectations of existing citizens. Miscangenation erodes and eventually, removes cultural identity. I know, ironic as we are so often sold ”diversity”, when the ultimate goal, is the exact opposite.
We will move from expectations of freedom and democracy, to simply trying to survive against a backdrop of surging violent crime and falling wages. People with an element of time and access of information, begin to think for themselves and can organise against things which are not in their interests.
This is just one strand of the multi faceted strategy being employed. With no money and no time, it is far easier to control dissent. Right now, the EU is working to close down dissent on the internet through the introduction of measures such as Article 11 and Article 13 blocking dissenting voices, driving people back towards mainstream media and other large corporate outlets which are ultimately, part of the propaganda machine. Fast forward, with Britain existing the EU, there is no longer any using the veto Britain has, to stop the creation of an army under the control of the EU itself. Think about that, how many army’s are there with no state control or accountability. An armed force which will be under the direct control of a small unelected group and vested interests, many of which, we don’t even know.
An army which would be utterly ineffective on the global stage, but perfect for crushing dissent populations, or what were, in time, should this continue, former nations and states.