Many schools and institutions have found themselves struggling to manage local demand over recent years. Particularly in light of austerity affecting funding and with the prospect of more to come if the UK does not leave the EU as a result of Brexit.
The council in Middlesbrough just published figures to the local council explaining just how damaging the effect of unchecked migration has become. James Cain, Local Democracy Reporter for Teesside live, reported that Middlesbrough Council has told the parents of more than 100 Year 6 pupils that there is no school place available for them in any of the towns schools due to unprecedented demand.
When pressed to explain how they could not know how many children they have in the local area, the council admitted that they had a requirement for more than an entire additional school class as a result of international new arrivals to the area.
One wonders how much challenge is being experienced more broadly in areas receiving even more new arrivals than Middlesbrough.
People wonder why ordinary Brits votes for Brexit? Suddenly finding your child unable to attend classes at any school within the local authority area due to uncontrolled immigration would seem to be an extremely reasonable reason for doing so. What are they meant to do while globalists continue to try and increase migration to reduce wages and working conditions for all?
Should they leave? Simply compounding the same problem elsewhere. Where would they go and who is paying for it? What compensation do they get for the council’s inability to meet their duty of care to those children and for the upheaval this will cause. Clearly, this isnt just Middlesbrough counties fault. Unfortunately, free movement didnt end when Britain voted to leave the EU. It is fortunate that at least it has slowed significantly, as there may have been hundreds more children affected. Where is the reporting on this issue in the mainstream media? Where do we see the numbers of children affected country wide?
Meanwhile, it has come to light that a recent advertising campaign during a referendum on joining the EU in North Macedonia blatantly showed advertising and posters telling citizens that a vote to join the EU and accept a change in the name of their country as a result, provided them with the opportunity to benefit from free healthcare and education in another EU country. Indeed, these claims were absolutely central to the vote. This is not unusual in accession countries and it appears that the previously successful countries within Europe, most of whom are now sliding into recession as a result of EU policy, can expect a future surge in demand for social services and the resulting austerity and inability to access key services, even as their economies tank, particularly across the Euro zone.