A MORE MARKETABLE EXTREMISM – THE KALERGI PLAN

The founding of the EU is surrounded by a great deal of dogma and propaganda but certain facts are undeniable.   The people of Europe were war weary after the continent experienced two world wars in quick succession.  European industry had been devastated and those countries most directly involved were looking for a means to promote relationships which forged stronger links between one another in order to avoid future conflict and rebuild their economies.

The years of war had seen the development of nuclear weapons and capabilities,  and then, demonstrated their use on a civilian population.  The fear of these weapons undoubtedly drove an increased will to create structures which would help to avoid future conflict which might see these weapons unleashed on European populations.  The horror of war was still fresh in the mind of European citizens and the fear of the devastation a future global conflict might bring was a specter that drove a great deal of fear concerning the future. Europe was looking for an answer.

There was a strong will to ensure that Germany could never again become a military power again and as a result of the war, much of German heavy industry had been dismantled and coal which was considered a strategic  asset,  were put under international control.

It may seem quite obvious to us today, having lived in an age of communication, but it was recognized that many countries in Europe all share borders, and had a great deal more in common than that which separated them.   The people of Europe had all shared loss and grief on a national scale and were to some extent, already united in that grief.  To avoid war and rebuild, the people of Europe would come together  and agree to a common set of values and economic objectives which could be agreed and aligned by shared treaties to promote interdependence and co operation.  It was thought that, countries which trade extensively with one another are far more unlikely to go to war.

Against this backdrop, the ideas of Richard Von Coudenhove-Karlergi began to gain traction in Europe in a way they had not managed previously, despite powerful backing among the world’s elite.   Many of the elite members of Kalergi’s Pro-Europa Committee were, and are, among the most powerful and connected of Europe and indeed, the world.

     Richard Von Coudenhove-Kalergi

Born in 1894, the ideological father of the EU was born of mixed raced Austrian and Japanese parentage.  Though his ancestry features Greek, Czech and Hungarian ancestry among others with a various links to the nobility of Europe.  He was born into a wealthy family in Japan where he was named Aoyama Eijro, The son of an Austrian diplomat and the daughter of an oil merchant  and antiques dealer who was also a major owner of land in Tokyo.  He became a Czech citizen in 1919.  He later became a French citizen, and retained this citizenship until his death in 1972.   

Kalergi had written a book call Pan-Europa (1923) and Practical Idealism in 1925 and was the creator of the powerful Pan-Europa committee.  This small group included a cadre of the powerful. Former Prime Ministers, senior ministers, prominent Jewish scientists such as Albert Einstein and writers of the time. The majority of which were Jewish.  It is notable that Louis de Rothschild and his friend, Max Warbug were huge supporters of Kalergi and indeed, it was Max Warburg, that large funded the early stages of the movement.

At the center of Kalergi’s entire belief system was the belief that a democracy was a transitional state and that some point, Europe would be run by a Jewish, aristocratic elite.  Which he openly termed, the ‘Master Race’.   It is no accident that this phrase was later coined by another supremacist, Adolf Hitler

He fought hard all of his life to encourage others to believe in the essential nobility and superiority of ‘Jewry’ in itself.   In Practical Idealism, a book every bit as extreme and delusional as anything written by Adolf Hitler, Kalergi wrote:  As a people Jewry experiences the eternal struggle of quantity against quality, inferior groups against high quality individuals, inferior majorities against superior minorities. 

And far more besides, which invited Europeans,  and the world in general, to accept the premise that the Jewish people are our intellectual and moral superiors and should acknowledge rule by an aristocracy of the same. 

This is a man that firmly believed that he was a member of a ‘master race’ (It was Kalergi that coined the term) that deserved to reign supreme, free from the fetters of democratic constraint.  He believed in racial diversity, because Jews were scattered to all parts of the globe and yet but proposed that the Jewish people themselves were perhaps among the most inbred in the world.  Leading to a suggestion of aristocratic racial purity.  He recognized that a way to divide and rule the countries of Europe, was to remove cultural and national identity. Leaving only the Jewish aristocracy as the noble ruling class and giving no one else anything to rally around to present objection to this state of affairs.  He goes on to say that;

Strength of character paired with sharpness of the mind predestinates the Jews in their most excellent specimen to become the leaders of urbane humanity, from the false to the genuine spiritual aristocrats to the protagonists of capitalism as well as of the revolution. [28]

He firmly believed that the master race were being held back by democracy and the jealousy of the inferior races (as he saw everyone else).  He would refer to the ‘other races’ as the slave people and often bemoaned the oppression of the nobility, born to rule, by these inferior slave races.  Yet, he acknowledgement that inbreeding among some Jewish communities had caused some physical probllems, in his mind this was a distraction, cause by oppression by the slaves, from the overall nobility of the class ‘born to rule’.  In stark contrast to Adolf Hitlers focus on physical perfection, genetics and the combination of physical and mental attributes, Kalergi seems to have instead focussed on a mental and spiritual ideal.

So much has the spiritual Master Race of the Jews suffered under the traits of the slave people that have impressed him in his historical development: still today many leading Jewish personalities carry the posture and gestures of the un-free repressed person.

The prominent position held by Jewry these days is owed to its spiritual supremacy which enables it to win the spiritual battle over enormous superior numbers of favored, hateful, jealous rivals.   Modern anti-Semitism is one of the many reactionary phenomenons of the mediocre against the supreme; it is a new form of ostracism applied against a whole people.

Kalergi was essentially, Adolf  Hitler’s ideological opposite in many ways and as I read much of what he wrote, it kept bringing to mind the arrogant assumptions and self assurance of Adolf Hitler.  There is a very similar man which comes through the more you read.  Is it this then that will bring Europe to its next world war.  Racial supremacy and the ambition, if not outright belief, that one has some sort of inate right to rule the people of Europe, whether they like it, or not?

Yet, also a brother of sorts ultimately, they seemed to agree on the ends justifying the means and the belief in being a member of some sort of master race with an automatic right to rule.  Ideas of racial purity and supremacy and the belief in a master race are all features both shared. Indeed, many account suggest that much of the anti Semitism in the Nazi movement came from a hatred of the Kalergi ideology and its belief in a ‘Jewish Master Race’ rather than a German one.  It is often suggested that that the Nazi’s arose as the inevitable backlash against the rise of this ideological extreme.   Extremism begetting extremism.   The timeless pendulum that seems to swing across much of European history and which we still see very much moving events today.  

Indeed, during the Nazi occupation, owning copies of Kalergi’s books were considered among the worst things that could be held against you if found by the Nazi’s and were burned wherever they found them. 

The writing of Kalergi centers around his belief that the Jews are in fact the ‘master race’ (he first used the term) and thus the only people truly fit to rule all of the inferior people  Though  like any extreme ideology, this ideology also purports that following what interim turmoil an adjustment period is required, we, the subjugated class, will be left  in a peaceful spiritual society free from war.    I think society has had more than enough experience to know  how that works out in practice. Extremism, begets extremism and inevitably, leads to less freedom, more  oppression, if not all out war.

It seems that, whichever extreme we move to, we end up with a ruling elite that want one thing. A continent, or world pacified by unelected, unaccountable rulers. 

Of course the EU deeply admires this man.  No outright genocide called for, at least not quite explicitly.  A takeover by wealth and stealth.  The Kalergi plan may or may not exist as a single document in itself.  If it does, I haven’t read it.  Yet the ‘plan’ is no conspiracy. It demonstrably exists as the sum of Kalergi’s books, talks and ambition.  At its essence,  is simply, a more marketable extremism to modern ears than Nazism with few discernible differences which matter to ordinary citizens.  

There is no doubt that Coudenhove Kalergi had plans for all the citizens of Europe and beyond.  Plans now adopted  and treated as more or less sacred by the EU.  Senior officials quote him, accept prizes in his name and follow his blueprint.  The EU even have a University named after a man who is a proven racial supremacist.

Make no mistake, Richard Von Cloudhove-Kalergi had far more in common with Adolf Hitler than seperates them.  Even now high ranking advocates of his plan call for genocide if the public will not be cowed into acceptance through over means.  The clock is ticking.  When you initially read the writing of Kalergi, it is easy to mistake i for the outright racist nonsense it is.  It just seems too farfetched and too obviously unattractive to be dangerous.   It is easy to write it off as crazy nonsense posing no threat.  The problem is, that when you read it as a regular citizen and when you read it as a member of the powerful elite, it sounds incredibly different depending on the mind of those considering the idea.  It seems that, if you are a very wealthy,  very well connected political figure, particularly in Europe, but not exclusively so, the ambition of starting a 1000 year dynasty from which your family and colleagues could never be ousted makes a whole lot of sense.    It is worth noting,  that even Adolf Hitler had to go through the bother of being democratically elected.   Kalergi did not even want to have to bother with democracy at all.  When you are that superior, what need have you of the approval of inferiors?. 

Already today, corruption and nepotism  in the EU itself is rife as is commitment to a sort of EU project centric fanaticism.  Anyone spending a lot of time within the machinery of Brussels can comment on the almost interchangeability in the mindset of officials and I have heard it put quite well by the head of a lobbying firm I once met who for obvious reasons, spends most of his time in Brussels.  “If they could clone them, they would”.  This is ‘group think’ written large, using a sort of fanatical quasi corporate language to hide a fanatical commitment to an ideology which is much aligned with Kalergi’s ambition.  I have heard it put quite well by the head of a lobbying firm in Brussels’  “If they could clone them, they would”.   

We are seeing the creation of a new ‘planned’ aristocracy hiding in plain sight.  I have seen for myself a sort of arrogance of power which seems to follow around even senior managers  within the European hierarchy.  This is something very reminiscent of the same sense of entitlement that was a hallmark of the nobility of the past, extensively commented upon in historical texts.  But I am sure that this will not surprise many of those who have had to deal with such individuals over recent years.

Decisions are made for the good of the project, not the people of Europe.  Often, a great deal of effort is expended to simply achieve a greater hold on power.   When one scrutinizes the work of the EU over the last 10 years, there is a great deal which suggests that decision making is driving towards post democracy.  Language and behavior even suggests that we may already be there but we, the people, just don’t know it yet.  

Did anyone in Europe vote on allowing the mass migration of up to 200 Million people from hostile countries and ideologies  into Europe, changing the demographic makeup of the continent forever and putting enormous numbers of people at risk of horrible violence?

One has to remember that Kalegi was a supremacist.  An unusual type of supremacist, he believed in diversity among the Jewish, yet proposed that inter breeding among the aristocratic Jewish was a good thing.   In Praksticher Idealismus (Practical Idealism) he says that the people of Europe should; interbreed with Asians and colored races, thus creating a multinational flock with no quality and more easily controlled by the ruling elite. 

So he was an odd sort of white supremacist.  A very exclusive sort of white supremacist because he did not even particularly like whites either.  He wanted dilution simply because he thought others more easily controlled.  Though he does suggest particular disdain for Asian (Except, unsurprisingly, for the Japanese whom he once claimed were the defacto rulers of Asia) and people of color in various ways over his lifetime.  

Kalergi paved the way for the EU dream of a post democratic Europe and an immovable ruling class free to pursue social engineering without even the pretence of democratic recourse.  One does not have to look very hard to see the bars being put in place around the jail even now, perhaps particularly now.  EU Article 11, Article 13 and an acceleration in the number of policies that present mechanisms for oppression, censorship and control or somehow increase the power of the EU itself over the democracy of nation states.   Despite a massive failure to deliver improvements in the lives of ordinary people and a movement away from public support for Euro skeptic populist parties, there is no time, in Brussels for any talk of meaningful reform.   They do not seem much concerned about the good will, or otherwise, of EU citizens.

But Kalergi’s ideas as presented in his books and writing were deeply flawed.  In fact, what we now know from our enforced participation in the grand social experiment of the EU flooding countries with migrants, is that it is not only race which separates people.  In fact, it turns out that culture can be a far stronger factor than race.  We now know, that multiculturalism did not work.  Some cultures are simply just better for the world than others and some are totally incompatible with western values.   Kalergi never seemed to have an answer to culture.  He seemed to think of culture as a function of race and did not seem to see see much difference between the two.  

We now know that people tend to divide along culture lines and we see many areas in western cities essentially becoming more and more homogenous outposts of a foreign power.  Far from integration, we have increasing segregation with some cultures choosing to import a completely different value system from their home nations and essentially, opting out of the host nations legal system in favor of their own imported set of ideological values.  Prompting ever increasing isolation, ever less social cohesion and a dependency on the state.  So, it would seem that capitulation will have to be forced.  Will they allow the mass rape of women to continue to get worse and worse?  Will they try to increase the social penalty for not being in an interracial marriage?

The vast majority of migrants into Europe have been men, in enormous numbers.  Bringing a very different attitude to the value of women in society and very different attitudes to violence and crime.   Social scientists studying countries where male children have always been favored and population has been radically skewed towards a prevalence of males have noted some very derogative effects which arise from this imbalance.

In societies where many men cannot find, wives, girlfriends, gang activity and violent crimes soars.  The most reckless violent crime usually being perpetrated by single unattached men.  Sexual crime increases exponentially, with an upsurge in particularly violent sexual crime and gang rape.   This is a trend seen in countries such as India, Pakistan and others.  China too has had related problems.   The fact upon which experts all seem to agree, is that a lack of available partners and high numbers of unattached young men lead to a commonly observed and demonstrably related set of outcomes. 

Some, such as the rise in violent crime, appear to cross many jurisdictional boundaries and cultures.  Others, such as violence towards women, do seem to be somewhat affected by culture.  However, in the west, poor migration policy and failed understanding by ideologically led and seemingly, willfully ignorant, governments have meant that culture is also being imported. 

 This is certainly something that Kalergi never seemed to predict.  In his world, there was more of a suggestion of ‘us’,  the ruling elite, and ‘them’ the inferior sub humans (as he once refers to everyone else). Because we would all just be ‘Europeans’ and share the same values, facial features and would just integrate as one homogenous bunch and leave the ideas of culture at home.  

He got it wrong.  What we are seeing in Europe is an intensification of many aspects of culture within these communities.   Some ideologies were designed to resist any form of integration and those are in fact distilled over two or three generations as those communities isolate themselves more and more from mainstream society.   A fact that concerns many of the elders and more integrated from those communities.  

Kalergi seems to have failed to have made for the provision that, his plan is unachievable without a resulting genocide as a result of forced compliance, oppression and brutality.  It turns out that the people of Europe are quite attached to their quality of life and their rights as citizens.  Although many of the freedoms and rights of European Citizens are being quietly undermined, overwritten with draconic dogma, or simply swept aside.  Yet so far,  the counter movement is growing faster as a result.  But still, many of the greatest advocates of the plan are those that will suffer the most.  Women of all kinds but feminists perhaps most of all.   This one group have been fanatistically useful tools for those that would push this agenda, particularly those on the political left.  Unable to see the danger, they are literally, the ‘Turkey voting for Christmas’.

Instead of the frontal assault and upfront genocide of the Nazi’s we are being brainwashed and conditioned by media to simply accept less.   To believe that we are not allowed to be white or German or British or anything else and that this is somehow a problem if we are.  That if we object to our replacement or refuse to give up our freedom to criticize our rights being taken away, those that speak up are demonized using the former allies of democracy, now gone bad, the mainstream media.  In countries like the UK, Sweden and Germany, victims of abuse are silenced, their advocates are slandered and they find themselves deplatformed and maligned.   Very much in alignment with the ultimate ambition of the plan.  Those that push this agenda come with the words of social justice and inclusion but they exclude themselves from the cost.  They are rarely going to be the victims of sexual crime and interbreeding whether force or otherwise.  They will increase their control of the narrative and will be the only voices heard in the public square and they dont really care how far they need to go to do it.  Of this, Kalergi himself would be proud.  The prize is enormous and many otherwise less violently fanatical proponents are easily swept up in the mantra that the end result must be achieved by all means, no matter how unpleasant.

This conditioning largely being along the lines that, those ‘for’ this extremist way of thinking are largely being marketed as ‘left’.  Making a group of temporarily useful allies.  Whereas anything else is ‘wrong think’ labelled in a variety of ways.   The irony of those being, that the end game, is never ‘left’ nor ‘right’ it is just all wrong for 99.9% of us that will not benefit from being among those ruling, if this march towards Kalergi’s future went ahead unchecked.

I do not believe that it will ever get that far. There will be a continued rise in an opposition and extremism if this plan is not reformed to something more acceptable or the EU will simply collapse along the way, committing suicide, rather than reform. 

Sadly, the EU are already taking steps to counteract this but I think they may just be accellerating their own demise.  In fact, in some respects, European civilization has devolved since Kalergi’s time making his vision even less likely.  The best tool for integration, is conversation, discussion and debate.  Without which, western civilisation could never have emerged.  But instead of encouraging this and allowing the tools which enabled all progress to take place, many western countries have outlawed vital discussion that could, over time, reduce tension and begun to disarm the most radical of ideas and bring about a more cohesive, passive society.

However, the backlash against this lack of consideration for the will of Europe’s citizens is already increasing exponentially. Yet, istead of addressing concern with discussion and reform.  The EU turn to propaganda and obfuscation.  This has become incredibly obvious to more and more of the public.

A movement of resistance is spreading  which ensures that the Kalergi vision of the future is impossible and will simply never happen unless it is at gun point.   A cynic might say then, that it is small wonder then that the EU now wants an army.  An army not large or balanced enough to be militarily useful in the world, but perfect for putting down dissent.  An organization claiming to promote peace and the prevention of war, wants an army..

An army free from the responsibilities of national government responsibility for the first time in history.   In recent history, wars have taken place for purposes which many have objected.  But at least they could vote to remove those that ordered them.  Now we shall have a European Army which is not accountable to those nations.  What one can’t do with democracy, an unaccountable ruling elite might achieve with force, suppression and oppression.  Indeed, key members of the Pan Europa group have actively mentioned the need for use of force in driving forward the agenda several times in the past ten years.  Small problem, no army of their own and a small matter of national law. So how do you get an army outside national law and sovereignty of nations?  This is how.

The entire point of the EU was to make sure that extremist ideas coming out of Germany never took root in Europe again.  Yet here we are.   From one form of extremism, to another, even before those that suffered the inevitable outcome of the last German lead social experiment are even all gone and certainly, for many of us, very far from out of mind.

So the vision that Kalergi had is attractive to the EU in many aspects, a pacified, homogenous race without many differences of opinion.  Where culture is a thing of the past and there a no motivating factors for dissent.   Yet where dissent is not tolerated and can be brutally suppressed by;  in his mind at least, a superior unaccountable master race in charge.

People in Europe are starting to see their danger.  The undemocratic overreaching of the EU leadership are starting to ring alarm bells for many.  But surely the leaders within the EU must read blogs, news and try to gain objective feedback from their vassal states citizens?  

Or perhaps they felt that with the influence and control of mainstream media, reversing the greatest development in the creation of freedom and democracy since the 1500 and 1600s,(the free press) that they are closer to that post democratic Europe than any of us realize? 

They certainly seem to think that they will get away with pushing democracy past breaking point by simply overwhelming populations with migration.  Doubling down on freedom of movement and throwing the borders wide open.  Adding to the problems of social cohesion in a blitzkrieg from which Europe could never return.   

There is some basis for their confidence. European citizens have never been good at holding EU leaders to account. 

So, unfortunately, they may be right.   It is going to recover the situation from here and the future looks pretty bleak for European Citizens.  However,  all is not lost.  They may have overplayed their hand and woken up so many citizens that until now, simply consumed mainstream media and the narrative which they were supposed to accept without question that a real challenge may be possible.

There are some green shoots of hope that show Europeans are not buying it as unquestioningly as they used to.  Many are starting to realize that they are the target of this vast experiment and are already witnessing the negative consequences in their day to day lives.  When the mainstream media tells you that you are wrong, for seeing and feeling something as a result of firsthand experience, the hold of the media is broken.  This is certainly born out in polls, viewer and readership figures. 

Parties that object to mass migration are now gaining fast traction all across Europe.  One of the three largest financial contributors to the EU, Britain, is now leaving.   A country that contributes as much as 19 other members combined.   Europe’s favourite dumping ground for migrants, Sweden is starting to learn the cost of bad choices.  Only second to Germany in the sheer numbers of migrants imported, they have only  1% of all migrants working and this is likely to be the story for a very long time.  A burden even a wealthy country can only afford for so long.  This has prompted an end to the open doors at Swedish borders.   Meanwhile, the victimised and demoralized Swedes who have seen that they are being victimised and sold out are learning for themselves why  all cultures are not equal. 

Italy, Poland, Hungry and others are also starting to resist this anti democratic mass experiment. 

This is not quite the Kalergi plan, though it takes much from it.  This is a perversion of an already bad plan which was never anything but deeply flawed extremist nonsense written by an elitist fanatical supremacist to begin with.  Truly a man only an elitist megalomaniac would love.  Perfect then, for the European Commissioners of today. 

Every 2 years a Coudenhove-Kalergi European prize is awarded to Europeans that have excelled in promoting his ideas.   Angela Merkel, Herman Van Rompuy and of course Jean Claude Juncker have all been awarded the prize most recently. For a full list of the awardees in recent decades see my follwing post.  It also shows the deep involvement of these and many others, some of whom are full members of the organisation. 

Picture taken at the Pan Europa / Coudenhove-Kalergi award ceremony held in Vienna in 2012.

The battle for the soul of Europe and Western European civilisation is not over yet.  Because people are starting to notice and resist this monstrous idea,  the EU is building an ideological wall around EU citizens under the guise of Article 11 and 13.  Further increasing the ability to censor the press to which they object and potentially to silence critics and block the free flow of information and ideas. 

However, the EU have never understood the law of unintended consequences to any real extent.  In fact, this may continue to rouse anti EU sentiment and drive those thus censored further toward extremes, driven by  feelings of victimisation and oppression.

If there is one thing that is interesting about the EU it is their approval ratings.  Very often, speeches and comments made in the media by EU Presidents and officials actually drive 1-2% swings AGAINST the EU in polls.   EU officials have never been very astute in their dealings with populations that have begun to suspect their motives and question their project.   The arrogance and derision with which many leaders have responded to genuine concerns or calls for reform have had a cascade effect against the EU in many countries over recent years and this trend is likely to increase with legislation more oppressive legislation like those mentioned (see my post on www.supremeleader.eu on that subject for more information).

 So, it may eventually be the that, the ultimate fate of the EU, is to bring about its own demise.   As it did in terms of the exit of Britain and the rise of populist parties in Europe.   The question is, just how much damage can be done in the meantime.  How miserable will ordinary people be and will the damage be reversible before Europeans realise that EU1.0  has failed them.