Friends of the Supreme Leader, we need to have a talk. It has come to my attention from comments and feedback that many people don’t know what globalism, as it is today, really is. More precisely, how the term has been hijacked by those who seek to benefit from establishing a new, post democratic, world.
For hundreds of years, those with most of the world’s money, and almost by default, therefore, power, never reconciled themselves to a democratic system where their will mattered as much as those with less.
This was famously summed up in interviews with various of those same people. With perhaps no better example than David Rothschild. Who, at least, was relatively honest about it. Though not as explicit as he is reported to have been in private.
On the other hand, this is the guy who also took action. Founding the Trilateral Commission, a precursor to the WEF, and now, what one might now consider, almost a subsidiary of the same organisation.
An organisation dedicated to creating a one-world government. Free from the constraints of democracy and accountability. To rule over the subservient class without accountability, merely by right of power and wealth.
If you think this is not a big deal, after all, there are plenty of groups lobbying for an advantage both in the USA and the EU. Well, this is no mere lobby group and has become nothing less than an anti-democratic coup. This project is now quite advanced towards achieving its aims, particularly in Europe, Canada and other countries with weaker safeguards around democracy itself.
This is well represented by Emmanuel Macron. A figure emerging from nowhere to suddenly become the President of France. He also happened to be the former personal banker of David Rothschild.
Another notable member of the project is the very visibly anti-British, Keir Starmer, prime minister of the United Kingdom. Starmer, being a former director, and current honorary member of the Trilateral Commission, famously said he would far rather be in Davos, than ‘Westminster’. Most British people can only dream he would sod off to Davos and never come back. He is an almost archetypal political mercenary, who will infamously change his position on almost anything, on a weekly basis, if it keeps him in a position where he has the power to deliver whatever those with wealth and power require in return for their support.
He is a great example of how the most mediocre of individuals can rise to stratospheric heights with zero morals and a nation to sell.
A curious individual, he seems to have started out as a rather pitiful character that found his way to communism during spotty adolescence, which in this case lasted throughout his university career. Later to attend a training camp in a Czechoslovakian work camp back when the cold war was still a very real thing and which had close ties to the USSR.
So it was, that, at 23, the son of a toolmaker, went behind the Iron Curtain to side with enemies of his own country. Apparently, entirely naïve to the fact that, being in an enemy state, controlled by communism, this might be a bad idea. It is arguable whether this was in fact the biggest ‘tool’ that Mr Starmer senior ever made during his long career.
Inevitably, the camp was monitored by the Communist Czechoslovakian Foreign Intelligence Main Directorate, who earmarked potential traitors that might be of use in the future. How Moscow must have laughed stupid when this clown was elected as prime minister of the United Kingdom. I hope that they at least got hiccups. It would be funny, had his stupidity not evolved to the point where he swapped, the original bad ideas, for what he has become.
Well, perhaps, if there was some delight in Moscow at the election of Keir Starmer, they will have been disappointed. Because, there was a new and more profitable game in town. Bring on the Trilateral Commission and globalist money, power to propel even the most broken tools to the top, as well as other corrupt anti democracy societies operating among the establish. Another great example, being the Fabian Society. Which deserves an article of its own and we will get to that.
So, even though this means, very visibly, leading to the rapid decline of the country he swore to serve and degrading the rights and freedoms of one of the world’s founding democracies until it becomes a shadow of its former self, the globalist had found their ideal puppet. A man with no morals and willing to sell out every aspect of the country and its people.
But, he is far from alone. Trudeau was an exemplary traitor, Carney is laughingstock, the former president of Argentina, though Argentina decided to save itself, for now, much of Africa, if the price is right and if they do not already work for China, the litany and roll call of traitors is long. People happy to sell out western democracy and the citizens of the nations that they swore to serve.
This treachery is well rewarded. One only has to look at the former leader of the Netherlands. The embarrassingly subservient pet, of the WEF, Mark Rutte. Who was and is about as abased before the throne of corporate globalists as it is possible to be and has been well rewarded for it since. Failing upwards to become the Secretary General of another largely puppet organization, the United Nations.
Then of course, there is their favored daughter in Europe, Ursula Von De Leyen. The puppet leader of the European Union, who can sail through almost any allegation of corruption no matter how serious. Seemingly, without an iota of concern. To get on this world, it seems, you only need to be from the right family. A career built upon failure, and being from a well connected family. This is theme with many of the present crop of political puppets. What is being created, is a ‘middle manager’ teir of familial political dynasties. Eroding democracy and preparing the way for a totally unelected and dynastic system of world government controlled by those pulling the strings.
So, there is an installed elite, incompetent, for the most part. With no significant achievements, other than a willingness to do anything at all for those that gave them their instructions. In some cases, quite the reverse. Coming out of nowhere, ala, Macron, or careers of ignominy and an ability to have achieved nothing of note at all, ala Von Der Leyen or ‘Sir’ Keir Starmer.
Who can forget Germany’s armed forces turning up to a NATO training exercise armed with wooden rifles? A national embarrassment under Ursula Von De Leyen during her almost farcical time as the German Minister of Defence. It must have been utterly humiliating for those soldiers and a massive moral disaster, demonstrating the total lack of respect that the German elite have for their armed forces.
Yet, she, and these same people now want people to fight and die for ‘Europe’ and have plans for conscription and serious prejudicial outcomes for those that do not agree to sacrifice themselves, their sons and daughters, for the powerful and their interests. Under the new globalist lead and increasingly anti democratic Europe, this would be a different sort of war. One that relies on the lie that soldiers serve to protect ‘Europe’, not their country, as if the idea of fighting for your country, or the EU elite, are in any way tied together.
We are invited to believed that, we would be going to fight in our own best interests and those of our families while in reality, we risk fighting for the very people that are trying to steal their rights, freedoms and nations from us and perhaps chillingly in the case of the leadership of the WEF, have expressed the need to reduce the population of the planet by 50% and total surveillance and control of each and every one of us. Promising, ruthless treatment in the case of any dissent.
So where did this all come from? Because it is far from new.
In the broad sense, globalism has come from the perversion of classic neoliberal thinking, which has emerged latterly morphed into a kind of economic feudalism. Unchecked and unregulated markets consolidated under ultra powerful corporations with no true natural market competition.
Regulation failed, free markets became monopolies, and with nothing left to acquire, merge or compete with, those with the true power, were no longer those whose power was previously limited by election to state office. They were corporate globalists and those they appointed to supra national front organisations.
The great thinkers of the past always recognised that while markets needed to be liberalized and free from state control, there had to be checks and balances or the ‘free market’ could never remain free. Corporations, like so many of those that rise to the top in that environment, are psychopathic by nature.
They will literally do anything at all to achieve their ends. This used to be checked by law and by regulation as a counterpoint to the obligation of boards of directors to achieve growth and shareholder value at any cost.
These are the new dynasties of our time, and they have begun to seize power and subvert governments more overtly and on a greater scale, that was ever the case throughout history. Never have organizations been so large, so powerful, and with so little accountability.
We could go on and on about the origins of globalization. I have read countless books about it myself. But that might be to miss the more serious point. We are where we are. We face an existential threat to freedom and democracy. While we are directed and distracted, encouraged to concern ourselves with far smaller matters.
We must fight this with all our might. In the United Kingdom, in France, in Germany, in Canada, and anywhere in the world that regards itself as a serious country, with rule of law and democracy.
Step 1. STOP thinking in terms of ‘Left’ or ‘Right’. These terms are ridiculously out of date concepts. So, your grandfather voted for the socialist leaning party? Your Father voted for the conservative seeming figure? Those things do not exist today, for the most part. The WEF and their subsidiaries have penetrated both. None more so than the formerly parties leaning left. Not because they care for social ideals. But because the makeup of those movements made them ideal for subversion. It always has. It isn’t that I am judging the historical position which these parties were created to champion. We clearly have bigger problems than tribal politics now. That sort of thinking is what got us here. Those tribal voters have to come to terms with the fact that ‘Left’ nor ‘Right’, as we used to understand those terms, simply do not exist, nor truly champion the objectives for which they were created.
None of the former parties were resilient when it came to this, and so they have been subsumed into the amorphous Uniparty in many of the countries targeted. Particularly those with long histories of democracy, which often seems to have lead to a largely two-party political system which through gradual infiltration and influence, only the words differ, but the destination is ever the same no matter which party was elected. A globalist victory seemed assured.
People have recognized this twisting of their traditional political parties on an almost instinctive level. Many became politically homeless for a time and in response to this we see a massive counter movement in Europe in particular. Leading to the almost unprecedented rise of many new parties surging to prominence in record time. Nowhere more so than in Britain, but right across western Europe, change is happening and we must seize the lifeline opportunity that it represents.
There will not be another chance to save democracy and preserve the hard-won rights of Europeans for future generations.
Earn democracy. Break out of the idea that you inherited what you voted for! This is what keeps corrupt parties in office for generations. So that nothing changes. How many parties across the EU, for example, rant about ‘change’ in some form, every election cycle. Are the electorate so stupid that they really believe that voting for an existing established party will yield any such thing? Look back over the last four election cycles, more?. Has there been anything but managed decline?
This situation has not been created recently, nor by accident, but the goal of corporate globalism for a long time. Most of those initial architects of the various schools of globalism probably never imagined where their rather naïve imaginings could lead.
If you are really interested in Globalism and its origins, you could do worse than reading ‘Globalism’ by Quinn Slobodian. But there are a lot of books on the origins of the nightmare that we find ourselves living in. If you are skeptical of the European Union and the anti democracy project which it is and find yourself wondering how such a seemingly blatant anti democracy power grab could come to pass, it is helpful to know how the foundations were put in place over a hundred years ago. There are many books on the subject. But personally, as a broad and relatively unemotional exploration of history, this was a pretty good factual chronological explanation.
